Corporate income tax
The corporate income tax has three tax rates and the
application is based on the type of income earned. Manufacturing income is
taxed at 18 percent, service income at 25 percent, and income earned by
retailers at 45 percent. One of the most interesting things is that the revenue
is not intended to go to the central government. Moreover, the law is written
that regional authorities can tax corporate profits up to 18 percent, 25
percent, and 45 percent.
Sales tax
The sales tax was first introduced on December 29, 1990 by
USSR Cabinet of Ministers. It was decided to approve a list of goods and
services whose sale on USSR territory will not incur the 5 percent sales tax.
The local and regional authorities may make additions to list of goods in
everyday demand and services to the population which are exempt from the sales
tax (see the appendix). population.
Further Drawbacks of the Russian Tax System
Attorneys and tax specialists in Russia say the greatest
problem facing enterprises is the lack of a satisfactory tax code. It is
necessary that tax policy should be circumscribed and that more power should be
given to the legislature. The nature of the tax structure allows some people to
be heroes by breaking the rules. For example, a pharmaceutical company chief
who had his security guard expel tax inspectors from his head quarters and
vowed to shoot them if they returned, was elected to a seat in Parliament
instead of going to jail. The penalties for non-payment of taxes is a defiency
of the tax system that drives people from the tax system because they are so
afraid of making a mistake that they prefer not to pay. For example, a standard
100 percent fine exists for understating income. The interest rate on late
payments alone amounts to 0.7 percent a day, or 255 percent per annum, a
penalty that can dwarf the actual liability. The penalty amount is presently
reduced and is tied to the refinancing rate of the Bank of Russia. The penalty
for each day of delinquent payments would equal 1/300 of the prime rate of the
Central Russian Bank.
Russia also does not have a specialized tax court. To seek
justice in tax issues, taxpayers have to find a people's court which is willing
to accept the case. The courts do not have expertise in the area of tax law
which is why most of the courts are reluctant to accept tax cases. The lack of
legal recourse leads to corruption within the tax collection system. Russia
does not have a law like the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or the Privacy
Act which hinders the accountability of the tax service.
Aside from ample monetary reasons to evade and avoid taxes,
taxes (in the Western sense) did not exist in Russia during the Soviet period
and therefore the idea of a Western style taxation is unpalatable to many Russians.
Taxes began to appear in the USSR only in 1991 which means that the current
population has only had to deal with the issue of taxation over a short period
of time. The result of this historical experience is that only between 60 and
75 percent of projected tax revenues have been collected this year.
Recent attempts to Improve Revenue
Decree No 1212 of August 18, 1996 is designed to improve tax
collection by preventing tax evasion and streamlining cash and non cash
turnover. Among other measures, the decree orders enterprises in arrears of
payments to the government to open settlement accounts in banks or credit
institution within the Russian Federation. Those accounts are referred to as
accounts of enterprise in arrears. When requested by the appropriate tax
authorities, banks and other credit organizations are required to provide data
about the transaction of enterprises holding these accounts. Taxation organ may
refuse to register the account of an enterprise in arrears in case there are no
funds available on the correspondent account of the bank or other credit
organizations. An interesting aspect of this decree is that the government
finally began to crack down on misrepresentation "in case of noncompliance
with this requirement or intentional provision of false information in the
notice submitted to taxation organ enterprise in arrears that had performed the
transactions in question will be fined by the taxation organ in the amount of
the transaction value". It has proposed to improve the tax system by
scrutinizing financial transactions through banks. If an enterprise opens a
bank account, the bank or other type of credit institution must immediately
inform the tax organs about the accounts for tax purposes. Such tax policy will
let the tax agencies observe tax payments more efficiently as everything will
be recorded.
Presidential Decree No 1212 of August 18, 1996 also
introduced policies concerning cases containing the circumstances stipulated in
the Law of the Russian Federation on Insolvency (Bankruptcy) of Enterprises,
the Federal Department on Insolvency (Bankruptcy) at the State Property
Management Committee of the Russia Federation shall file with arbitration court
request to institute proceedings on insolvency (bankruptcy) against enterprises
that have repeatedly violated this Decree during one calendar year. As it was
with collective farms and state farms, enterprises can just change their names
and continue to evade taxes. An important issue related to insolvency is loss
of massive amounts of jobs and what will workers and one enterprise" towns
do for a living and revenue.
On the bases of the decree, the government has widened its
crackdown on tax evaders--adding several leading oil companies to a list of tax
delinquents that might be forced into bankruptcy court unless they pay their
arrears. The move was the latest in a series of desperate measures the
government is taking to boost tax collection and mend its thread bare budget.
The government hopes that by threatening major tax evaders with bankruptcy,
they will scare the country's errant tax payers into filling empty coffers.
Major companies targeted for bankruptcy can avoid insolvency proceedings, if
their accounts showed the government owes them an amounts equal to their tax
debts for fuel supplied to state organizations.
The most recent step in fighting tax evaders was Russian
presidential decree No 1428, (dated (October 11, 1996, which created a
Processional Emergency Commission (the Commission) on strengthening fiscal
discipline. The major principals and objectives are:
. Control over the timely and full payment of taxes and
customs and other compulsory payments; . The elaboration of measures to secure
a full-scale collection of taxes and other compulsory payments; . Securing the
legality and efficiency of the work of tax and customs, as well as tax police
agencies; . Control over the timely and special-purpose use of the resources of
the federal budget and state extra budgetary funds. . Take decisions to carry
out checks of the financial and economic activity of legal entities and
compliance by individuals and entities with the tax, customs and banking
legislation of the Russian Federation; . Check the operations of tax and
customs bodies;
. Organize check of the timely and special-purpose use of
the resources of the federal budget and state extra budgetary funds.
In addition, the President granted broad powers to the
Commission to meet the objectives of the decree and secure its accountability.
Monetary Policy
Interest rates, much
to the chagrin of reformers, in the past barely reacted to currency
stabilization and the ensuing drop in inflation. Little confidence existed in
the sustainability of reforms while inflation expectations remained high. In
1996, interest rates finally started to come down--albeit slowly. Real interest
rates, however, are still very high. As recently agreed by the Russian
government and the IMF, the ruble is due to become convertible by 1997. Better
access to the ruble market could thus lead to a rapid increase in international
interest in the currency. Nevertheless, the ruble is trying to join the club of
respectable currencies. Due to the establishment of a crawling peg, the
currency's downslide is almost under control. A generally more stable economic
environment and high interest rates could make the ruble more attractive. The
ruble's recent past has been eventful to say the least. Between January
1992--effectively the start of economic reform under Yeltsin--and March
1995,the currency depreciated by a massive 2,130 percent. In the second quarter
of 1995, an over-restrictive monetary policy led to a severe shortage of the
currency which then duly appreciated by 15 percent within three months. As
concerns rose that too rapid currency appreciation would further destabilize
the economy, the free-floating ruble program was abandoned and a 'ruble
corridor', which envisaged further depreciation but within predetermined
limits, was introduced. The ruble corridor program has proven to be quite
successful. The Central Bank, which has been intervening repeatedly in the
market, has managed to keep its foreign exchange reserves at a satisfactory
level, and the business community has been able to rely on a more predictable
exchange rate trend. In July 1996, the 'fixed' ruble corridor (the upper and
lower limits of which only had to be redefined every few months) was
transformed into a 'variable' ruble corridor, with the band shifting on a daily
basis. Under this program, monthly depreciation now stands at around 1.5 percent.
By the end of December 1996, the exchange rate against the dollar should have
reached Rb 5,700/US $.
Russia's monetary environment started showing promising
signs of stabilizing in 1996. During 1995, inflation reached 200 percent by
December. 1996 is drawing to a close and the inflation rate seems set to fall
to 19 percent. The central bank has been pursuing a very consistent policy
lately, so its goal of maintaining monetary stability looks credible. Moreover,
low inflation is one of the conditions imposed by the IMF in return for its
monthly credit and it is therefore hardly in the government's interest to start
emission based means of financing the budget deficit. The main risk for
inflation could come from a high budget deficit due to low tax revenues.
Financing the deficit has become easier than in the past due to good
international credit ratings--for example, IBCA: BB+, Moody's: Ba2.--are making
it cheaper for Russia to borrow on the foreign capital markets.
A key element of Russia's macroeconomic stabilization
program has been a tight monetary policy to soak up excess rubles floating
around the Russian economy and fueling inflation. That policy's success is
among the factors that drove T-bill yields up by 26.6 percent Monday to an
annualized 121.4 percent on the secondary market. Just a month ago, yields
stood at 53.33 percent, according to Skate-to Press Consulting Agency.
The reason for the jump, analysts say, is simple supply and
demand - little ruble supply in the market at a time when government spending
demands revenue. The banks do not have the money to invest in GKO (treasury
bills) at 3 percent per month--but they will find the money to invest for 10
percent per month. Russia's monetary expansion under the IMF agreement is not
to exceed 3 percent, compared with 9 percent in December. Combined with
promises by Yeltsin to repay wage arrears and ease the impact of reforms on the
social sphere, that tight policy has forced the government to raise yields as a
lure to banks to loan the government money.
Intergovernmental Finance
The decentralization
of the Russian Federation's intergovernmental financial relationships began
with a series of successive tax sharing arrangements along with the regions
expenditure responsibilities increasing. This sharing and reassignment strategy
continued up to and on through the adoption of a new constitution in December
1993. In Russia, the tax formula sharing rates vary by region and are often
negotiated by each locality with the center. This makes any assessment about
the equity impact of transfers or their effects on local revenue effort
difficult. A general disadvantage of tax sharing is that it does little to
enhance local accountability or efficiency. Localities receive revenue
regardless of their tax effort and have no discretion to set the tax rate or
base. If they view these revenues as costless, their incentive to spend
efficiently is lessened. The result may be undue expansion of subnational
spending. In Russia shared taxes are retained by (or accrue to) the
jurisdiction in which they are collected. This differs from most market
industrial and developing economies where shared taxes (like the VAT in
Germany) may be shared through a formula based on factors such as population,
per capita income, urbanization or other factors. Derivation-based sharing as a
rule channels resources to high income areas where the tax base and, therefore,
revenue collections are largest. It is thus inherently counter-equalizing. This
may be a problem in countries where regional inequities are serious and where
the intergovernmental system lacks other instruments (such as transfers) to
address such imbalances.
The intergovernmental fiscal relations of the Russian
Federation continues to be highly opaque due to the bargain-based system which
presently is being utilized. The bargain-based system is making accountability
in fiscal policy even worse than is necessary--therefore further reducing the
transparency. The size and structure of the Russian Federation contributes to
the problems occurring in its fiscal relationships. It is made up of 89 regions
consisting of 29 republics, 50 oblasts, 6 krais, and 10 autonomous okrugs, plus
2 metropolitan cities (Moscow and St. Petersburg) which are referred to as the
89 "subjects of the federation" in the constitution. The regions are
even further subdivided into more than 2000 districts, where all the local
governments within a region report to the regional governments and are subject
to regional regulations, although each local government has independent"
(emphasis added) budgetary and administrative status.
Effects of Decentralization
Economic
decentralization has led to the transfer of a number of services with major
benefit spillovers (education, health, and social welfare) to the regional and
local levels. While the administration of these programs by local governments
may be appropriate because they are closer to the people, the many small local
governments that have been created as a result of the strong political push for
decentralization cannot likely provide these services at an adequate level from
their own resources. In some regions, enterprises' "public" spending
exceeds budgetary social spending and, in a few "one-company towns"
there is no public spending by the budget at all on non-administrative
functions. Enterprises did not provide these services once privatized, and
responsibility fell onto regional and local governments to finance them. But
local governments will need revenue sources to finance the additional burden.
Decentralization, which led to ownership assignment and
financial responsibility, has caused the regions to become more involved in the
commercial sector through producer subsidies, capital transfers, and
privatization. It has also led to the budgetary expenditures by the regional
governments to increase from 13 percent of the GDP in 1992 to around 18 percent
in 1994. Recent policy changes have suggested that this trend of more
subnational spending is likely to continue.
Страницы: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
|